Answered on October 23, 2025
Intent-Based Marketing (IBM) is a strategy that focuses on identifying and engaging buyers based on their real-time behavior, interest signals, and purchase intent, rather than just their demographic profile or job title.
In simpler terms: instead of guessing who might want your product, IBM helps you spot the people who are already showing signs that they do, and then equips you to act on it fast.
Identifying Intent Signals. Intent-based marketing hinges on buyer intent data, and this can come from two sources:
Platforms like Demandbase, Bombora, and 6Sense aggregate this type of intent data using natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and IP reverse lookups to track topics being researched and identify the companies doing that research.
Scoring and Interpreting Intent. Once this data is captured, IBM platforms assign scores based on frequency, recency, and relevance of the behaviors.
Personalizing Engagement. Once intent is identified and scored, marketing and sales teams use that insight to personalize their approach:
Related → How to Use Intent Data for B2B Sales and Marketing
Let’s say you’re a B2B SaaS company offering an AI-powered customer support platform.
Now imagine a mid-sized fintech company starts reading several G2 comparison pages featuring your platform, your competitor, and general “best AI support tools in 2024” articles.
Around the same time, someone from that company also downloads an eBook from your site titled “How to Reduce Support Costs with AI.”
These are strong third-party and first-party intent signals.
With IBM:
Intent-based marketing works because it:
Related → What Is B2B Intent Data? How to Get It, Use It, and More
| Category | Intent-Based Marketing (IBM) | Traditional Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Core Focus | Targets users actively showing buying intent or interest based on behavioral signals. | Focuses on promoting products/services to a broad audience regardless of their current intent or readiness. |
| Audience Targeting | Highly targeted; leverages data such as search queries, website visits, content consumption, and firmographic insights. | Broad targeting based on demographics, geography, and generalized audience segments. |
| Timing | Real-time and responsive; engages prospects at the right moment based on intent signals. | Scheduled and fixed; timing is often based on campaign calendars, not user behavior. |
| Data Usage | Data-driven; uses behavioral, contextual, and intent data from multiple sources (B2B signals, 3rd-party data, etc.). | Limited data usage; relies more on historical performance, assumptions, or market averages. |
| Engagement Style | Personalized and contextual; messages are tailored based on where the buyer is in their journey. | One-size-fits-all; messaging is often generic and the same across all audience segments. |
| Conversion Efficiency | High, since outreach happens when prospects are showing intent, increasing relevance and engagement. | Lower, as outreach often hits users not ready to buy, leading to wasted impressions or low ROI. |
| Buyer Journey Integration | Integrated throughout the buyer journey; adapts content and messaging based on journey stage. | Often disconnected from the actual buyer journey—same messaging across different stages. |
| Sales Alignment | Strong sales and marketing alignment; sales teams are fed high-intent leads, improving closing rates. | Often siloed—leads may not be qualified or timely, causing friction between sales and marketing. |
| Measurement of Success | Success is measured using intent KPIs like engagement lift, pipeline velocity, and buyer journey progression. | Focuses on top-level KPIs like impressions, reach, brand recall, and sometimes click-through rates. |
| Cost Efficiency | More cost-effective due to better targeting and reduced ad waste on uninterested audiences. | Less efficient; broader campaigns often mean higher spend with low conversion rates. |
| Use of Personalization | High personalization; dynamically adapts based on the intent data and buyer signals. | Low personalization; relies on static messaging and creative. |
| Scalability | Scales based on data inputs and automation; easily optimized in real-time. | Requires manual campaign scaling and broader planning cycles. |
| Examples | Retargeting pricing page visitors, dynamic ad placements based on firm intent, sales outreach to researching companies. | TV commercials, billboard ads, trade shows, generic email campaigns. |
Traditional B2B marketing efforts typically start with a simple formula: define your ICP, build a contact list, craft a message, and blast it out—through ads, emails, cold calls, you name it.
It’s structured, but it’s also predictive and assumption-heavy.
Meanwhile, intent-based marketing focuses more on who is interested in the product.
Instead of assuming a VP of IT might be interested in your cybersecurity platform, IBM uses intent data to detect that the same VP has recently:
In traditional B2B, marketers plan campaigns quarterly (or even annually for some). You spend weeks developing assets, segmenting lists, and scheduling outreach. And by the time your message goes out, your buyer’s needs may have changed, they’ve already chosen a competitor.
Intent-based marketing, on the other hand, runs in real time. It constantly monitors buyer behavior across the web and your owned channels.
When an account surges in activity—visiting pricing pages, reading product comparisons, or increasing keyword search volume—your team is alerted instantly.
That means you can activate relevant content, sales outreach, or paid campaigns the moment interest spikes.
Another core difference lies in how success is measured. Traditional marketing often aims to reach as many relevant accounts as possible. Impressions, opens, and click-throughs dominate reporting.
The thinking is: the more people who see the message, the higher the chance someone bites.
IBM takes a different approach by focusing on account readiness, i.e., which accounts are actively researching, which contacts are engaged, and which ones show buying signals across channels.
In a nutshell: The biggest difference between intent-based marketing and traditional marketing lies in how they approach the buyer:
Related → Demystifying Intent: Understanding Its Definition & Significance in Sales
Every sales and marketing team wants to focus on the right accounts—but “right” is usually defined by firmographics alone: industry, size, revenue. That’s helpful, but not enough.
That’s why when they launch a campaign, the MQLs they get are mostly people who filled out a form. They’re not necessarily ready to buy. They may not even be the one making the purchase decision.
With intent-based marketing, you shift from form-fills to behavior-backed leads. These are companies showing active interest—researching your product category, comparing vendors, reading in-depth content about your solutions.
That means when these B2B leads hit your CRM, they’re already problem-aware, solution-aware, and often deep into the decision phase.
Intent-based marketing aligns your outreach with the buyer’s timeline. You don’t have to convince them or deploy some ‘shady’ sales tactic—they already know what they want.
That alignment means deals move faster through the funnel. Instead of 6-12 months of slow nurturing, sales can jump straight into value-based conversations with context already in hand.
And since the prospect is already warmed up by relevant personalized messaging and content based on their behavior, conversion rates improve. It gets even better when sales can tailor their pitch to the exact topics the buyer was exploring.
In traditional campaigns, most of your budget gets spent on people who aren’t ready to buy. That’s a waste of ad spend, email sends, SDR hours, and design resources.
Intent-based marketing makes better use of this money. You allocate your resources where there’s a real chance of conversion—and that’s people already in-market. This allows for tighter campaign targeting, higher ROI, and fewer wasted impressions.
B2B buyers expect relevance. If your messaging is generic, you’ll be ignored no matter how good your product is.
Intent-based marketing unlocks dynamic personalization based on real-time behavior.
If a company is researching “automated onboarding tools,” they shouldn’t get a nurture email about pricing plans. They should get a demo invite with onboarding benefits front and center.
By mapping content, offers, and campaigns to the exact stage of the buying journey, you’re able to personalize at scale without manually segmenting every message.
Account-based marketing (ABM) works best when it’s fueled by intent data. This is because it helps you figure out which accounts are actually showing signs of life (and which aren’t).
With IBM, you can tier your ABM efforts:
This gives your ABM program precision targeting, real-time prioritization, and better use of resources.
Intent data is only valuable if you know whose intent you’re trying to interpret. Before you start tracking signals or choosing platforms, your foundation must be solid:
Who are you trying to target, and what matters to them?
Here’s what to do:
DB Nuggets → Run short interviews with front-line teams to uncover nuanced buyer insights that aren’t in your CRM. For example,
- how long do deals typically take?
- what makes a champion advocate internally?
- what objection killed the last deal?
Then, validate these in customer interviews.
Intent signals come in two forms: first-party (data you own) and third-party (data from external sources). You’ll want to combine both for maximum visibility.
Here’s what to do:
DB Nuggets → When choosing a provider ask:
- How fresh is the data? (Daily updates vs. weekly)
- What keywords or topics does it track?
- How accurate is account-level resolution?
- Can it show signal strength or historical surges?
- How well does it integrate into my CRM, MAP, and ABM stack?
In addition, before launching full campaigns, take historical closed-won deals and run a test to see if intent data correctly identified those accounts during their buying journey.
If the match rate is low, refine your signal topics or provider.
Related → 6Sense vs ZoomInfo: 2025 Comparison (+More Options)
Reader’s Question:
So, why is second-party intent data less commonly used in intent-based marketing?
Here’s why:
| Data Type | Control | Scale | Relevance | Ease of Use | Common Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-party | High | Medium | High | Easy | Very common |
| Third-party | Low | High | Medium-High | Easy | Very common |
| Second-party | Low | Limited | Varies | Manual | Rare |
Related → Different Types of Intent Signals for B2B Marketing | Demandbase
Not every buyer showing intent is ready for a demo. You must distinguish between early-stage researchers and high-intent buyers to avoid burning leads too early.
Here’s what to do:
DB Nuggets → For each signal strength, predefine a sales motion. For example:
- Low intent → Wait and nurture.
- Medium intent → SDR outreach with educational content.
- High intent → Direct AE call with tailored pitch and demo.
You can’t act on every signal because resources are limited. So you need a way to prioritize outreach based on buyer readiness, revenue potential, and fit.
Here’s what to do:
DB Nuggets → Cross-reference customer intent with CRM data (open opportunities, lead scores), firmographics (size, revenue), and current engagement (email clicks, page visits).
This gives a clearer picture of account readiness.
Intent is only useful if it guides how you talk to prospects. A buyer searching for “AI customer support tools” should receive different messaging than one reading “Zendesk vs Freshdesk comparisons.”
Here’s what to do:
DB Nuggets → Build flexible assets (e.g., case studies, landing pages) where elements like headline, industry name, pain point, and CTA can dynamically change based on account data or intent signal.
This enables scalable personalization.
You need to show up where your buyers are. Intent-based marketing only works when it fuels engagement across all touchpoints: ads, emails, content, outbound, and even customer success.
Here’s what to do:
Build an orchestrated playbook per funnel stage:
Sync data across platforms:
Measure engagement per channel: Use UTM parameters and platform analytics to track which channels convert best per segment. Double down on high-performing combinations (e.g., display + outbound email for Tier 1).
DB Nuggets → Use AI agents or automation platforms to trigger multi-step sequences (e.g., ad view → email drip → SDR call → SMS reminder) automatically based on real-time behavior.
Like any marketing approach, IBM is simply another system. You need regular feedback loops to optimize messaging, scoring, content themes, and sales engagement.
Here’s what to do:
Track performance metrics by layer:
Run attribution reports: Use multi-touch attribution tools to see which combinations of signal + channel + content lead to the highest conversion rates. This helps you refine the scoring model and content mapping.
Refine signal thresholds: Recalibrate your scoring model every quarter.
Feedback loop with Sales: Set up regular check-ins with SDRs and AEs to gather qualitative insights.
DB Nuggets → Build a dashboard that pulls in real-time signal engagement and overlays it with pipeline and revenue data.
Once your system works, the next goal is to scale. But scaling too fast without control will drown your marketing in noise or misfire on personalization.
Here’s what to do:
Audit your tech stack for automation readiness:
Roll out new verticals or geos gradually: Clone your best-performing playbooks and adapt them for new industries, regions, or buyer types.
Expand to post-sale and expansion motions: Use it to detect customer churn risk or upsell opportunities based on product usage signals, support queries, or content engagement.
DB Nuggets → Assign owners across teams (data, ops, sales, and content) to govern intent strategy. Make them responsible for testing new vendors, refining workflows, and training teams every quarter.
Did you know?
Demandbase can help you automate signal monitoring, scoring, and account tiering in real time so you don’t have to manually track everything.
Intent-based marketing can influence multiple parts of the buyer’s journey. So before jumping into data, define which area(s) of the funnel you’re trying to impact:
Once you define this, you can attach metrics that map to the actual business outcome you care about.
Example goal: “Increase conversion rate of surging accounts to qualified pipeline by 25%.”
To measure ROI effectively, you need to track every touchpoint that happens as a result of intent signals. That means integrating your intent platform into your CRM and marketing automation tools so you can attribute activity correctly.
Here’s what that looks like in practice:
Use first-touch, last-touch, or multi-touch attribution depending on your funnel complexity. Multi-touch is most accurate, especially for longer B2B sales cycles.
Once tracking is in place, you want to evaluate pipeline movement and performance for accounts influenced by intent-based campaigns versus those that weren’t.
Some key metrics to track include:
This shows how well your campaigns are turning intent into pipeline.
High win rates here signal the quality of the intent leads and messaging alignment.
Use this to compare how fast deals close with intent-powered engagement versus standard campaigns.
This helps you understand how much revenue you generate per customer or deal on average.
For example, If engagement increased from 200 clicks before a campaign to 300 after:
Track:
Compare this to your CAC from other sources (e.g., paid ads, cold outbound). If intent-based campaigns are giving you lower CAC and higher conversion, that’s a strong efficiency signal.
For example, If you made $20,000 in revenue from a $5,000 ad campaign:
So for every $1 spent, you earned $4 back in revenue.
The standard marketing ROI formula still applies here, but with more context:
Where:
Example: If you spent $20,000 on an intent-based campaign (data, ads, social media, tools) and it generated $100,000 in new revenue, your return on investment would be:
[($100,000 – $20,000) / $20,000] x 100 = 400%
One of the first hurdles teams face when rolling out intent-based marketing is the overwhelming flood of data.
The moment you connect an intent provider to your system, you’re exposed to a large volume of behavioral signals: companies researching specific topics, spikes in keyword activity, page visits, ad engagement, and so on.
On paper, this looks ‘good’. But without proper filters and frameworks, it creates an even bigger problem.
Teams often fall into the trap of treating every signal as urgent, chasing every account that clicks an article, and spreading themselves too thin. The absence of a clear way to score, tier, and contextualize these signals leads to wasted time, cluttered dashboards, and misaligned outreach.
Many companies rush to adopt intent data solutions without confirming if those platforms integrate smoothly with tools like Salesforce, HubSpot, or Marketo.
As a result, even when high-intent accounts are flagged, the data sits idle in a siloed dashboard, never making its way into active workflows. Or worse, it gets pushed into CRM as a static field that no one pays attention to. This lack of automation breaks the entire point of intent-based marketing.
For the strategy to work, intent signals need to trigger actions in real time—personalized email journeys, targeted ads, SDR alerts, or account prioritization.
If the data can’t flow into the right systems at the right moment, your strategy becomes manual, slow, and fragmented. And when your teams can’t act fast on real-time buying signals, you’re just watching opportunities pass by.
Intent data is powerful, but it often operates at the account level, missing out on the individual level. You may see that Company X is researching “automated compliance tools,” but you don’t know who within the company is doing the research.
Is it a technical evaluator? A procurement analyst? A decision-maker?
That lack of visibility creates a gap between what the data tells you and what your sales team needs to personalize outreach effectively.
The ripple effect is you’re now forced to guess, which often leads to generic messaging and missed opportunities.
This challenge is particularly painful for sales reps who need accurate personas to engage the right stakeholders. It also complicates personalization, which is one of the core advantages of using intent in the first place. Without knowing who’s showing interest, the precision that IBM promises begins to fade.
Just because an account showed interest last week doesn’t mean it’s still warm. Intent signals have a shelf life—and the highest-performing campaigns are those that move fast when a signal appears.
Use automation or rule-based triggers to ensure your campaigns launch as close to the signal spike as possible. Whether it’s triggering an email, launching a targeted ad set, or notifying sales—speed matters.
If your campaign takes two weeks to reach an account after they show interest, you’ve already lost the window. IBM is as much about timing as it is about targeting.
Every good IBM campaign starts with understanding what your buyers are signaling interest in. That means going beyond a “surge” alert and actually segmenting your accounts by intent themes—the topics, challenges, or solutions they’re researching.
These intent themes are the foundation of your campaign’s relevance.
Once you’ve identified themes, build separate messaging tracks around them.
Think of each track as a micro-campaign: it has a tailored value proposition, focused assets, relevant proof points, and specific CTAs.
Intent signals are only ‘useful’ if you meet buyers where they are. That means activating your campaign content across multiple channels, from email and paid ads to your website and SDR outreach.
But here’s the catch: the messaging and experience must feel cohesive.
If an account is surging on “digital transformation in banking,” and they see a LinkedIn ad about it, click through to a blog, then get an SDR email that talks about generic productivity tools—it breaks trust.
Your multichannel strategy should reinforce the same narrative across every touchpoint, creating a sense of familiarity and relevance as the buyer moves from awareness to engagement.
IBM campaigns are most successful when sales is looped in before the launch. That means sharing the account segments, intent themes, messaging tracks, and even sample talk tracks with your sales team early on.
And when high-intent accounts eventually engage, give reps complete context:
This allows SDRs and AEs to pick up the conversation where marketing left off.
Intent-based personalization doesn’t have to mean writing everything from scratch.
The smartest approach is to build flexible content frameworks that can be dynamically assembled or slightly tailored based on the buyer’s industry, pain points, or intent signals.
This could look like:
With tools like GenAI, you can scale content variations faster. The trick is building a core messaging library and then tweaking based on what buyers are telling you through their behavior.

DemandbaseOne is a leading B2B go-to-market (GTM) platform built specifically for account-based marketing (ABM), sales intelligence, and intent-driven engagement.
The platform is designed to unify first-party and third-party data to help revenue teams identify, target, and convert high-value accounts across the entire buyer journey.
It also integrates AI-powered account intelligence with real-time behavioral insights, enabling marketing and sales teams to coordinate their efforts, prioritize the right accounts, and deliver highly personalized, multi-channel experiences.
What are users saying about DemandbaseOne?
Case Study → Ingram Micro and CloudBlue increases pipeline velocity by 83%
6Sense Revenue AI is a B2B intent and revenue orchestration platform that helps marketing, sales, and revenue teams uncover hidden demand, prioritize in-market accounts, and engage buyers with precise timing.
It uses AI, machine learning, and behavioral data to predict where accounts are in the buying journey—even when no form fills or direct signals exist.
What are users saying about 6Sense?
Recommended → Is 6Sense Worth It? An Honest Review (Based on 100+ Users)
Bombora is an intent data provider that helps B2B companies discover which businesses are actively researching topics related to their product or category.
Unlike full-stack ABM platforms, Bombora focuses exclusively on gathering, analyzing, and delivering high-quality, privacy-compliant third-party intent data.
The platform allows marketers and sales teams to prioritize accounts that are surging in interest, enrich targeting, and personalize outreach based on real buying signals.
Key Features:
What are users saying about Bombora?
Pro Tip → You can use Bombora intent to power marketing and sales growth at every stage of the account journey.
ZoomInfo is a go-to-market platform that helps B2B sales, marketing, and revenue teams identify, engage, and convert their ideal customers through a rich mix of contact data, company intelligence, intent signals, and orchestration tools.
In addition, ZoomInfo’s intent features are powered by Clickagy technology, which captures behavioral signals from across the web and maps them back to accounts researching specific topics.
Key Features:
What are users saying about ZoomInfo?
Terminus is an account-based marketing platform designed to turn buyer intent into orchestrated, multi-channel engagement.
It offers real-time advertising, omnichannel orchestration, and first-party engagement tracking. This helps B2B marketers surround the buying committee with timely, relevant messaging wherever they are.
What are users saying about Terminus?
Cognism is a global sales intelligence & intent platform tailored for B2B teams. It combines Bombora-powered third-party intent data with firmographics, technographics, and contact-level information to enable outreach based on strong in-market signals.
In addition, every contact in Cognism database undergoes rigorous verification and cleansing to meet data protection laws like GDPR and CCPA. The platform also offers a proprietary Do-Not-Call list for ethical and legally safe cold outreach across regions.
Key Features:
What are users saying about Cognism?
The current state of intent marketing is largely reactive. You wait for someone to research a keyword, visit a competitor’s site, or click on a webinar invite, and then you act.
But with advances in AI, especially large language models (LLMs), we’re moving toward a world where machines can anticipate intent before it happens.
For example:
This predictive power means marketers and sales reps can engage prospects before competitors even know they’re in-market.
In the past, intent marketing was account-focused. If the account showed intent, you activated campaigns.
But today’s B2B buying decisions are made by buying committees, which requires understanding individual intent within the group. This means shifting from account-level targeting to persona-level personalization.
CMOs might be reading about budget planning. CTOs might be diving into product architecture. Procurement might be concerned with compliance. Your strategy should reflect that diversity.
The rise of AI-driven content personalization means you can now dynamically adapt messaging, assets, and experiences for each individual buyer.
Quick examples include: web pages that change headlines depending on who’s visiting. Email nurtures that mirror the role’s most pressing challenge. And SDR scripts that shift based on a stakeholder’s recent research patterns.
This level of personalization makes each stakeholder feel like your brand “gets” them. It also builds trust faster and increases the chance of buy-in from every angle of the committee.
Right now, most companies use intent data to acquire new customers. But a major emerging trend is using that same data to retain, upsell, and grow your existing customer base.
For example, you can take customers’ behaviors and link them to a signal.
With the right setup, you can detect these signals early and respond with an action.
Let’s say a current customer starts visiting G2 pages for one of your competitors, the account manager can step in, offer a check-in call, or share roadmap updates.
On the flip side, if they show interest in a new product category you offer, marketing can trigger a campaign offering them an exclusive preview or upgrade deal.
With regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and the phasing out of third-party cookies, the way we capture and use intent data is changing fast.
The future of intent marketing will be shaped by privacy-first frameworks that protect the user while still delivering value to marketers.
That means:
This push for ethical intent marketing will help companies stay compliant, and might even become a competitive differentiator.
Here’s why top-performing marketing and sales teams trust Demandbase to power their intent-based marketing strategies:
Spotted: Future Customer, Page 3 of Your Blog.
Platforms use IP-to-company matching, publisher data co-ops (where websites share anonymized behavioral data), and bidstream data from ad exchanges. These methods identify account-level research activity even without personal tracking.
Initial signs like better ad engagement and improved sales conversations can show within weeks. But the real impact, like shorter sales cycles and larger deal sizes, typically becomes clear over one or two full sales quarters.
Website analytics track visitors on your site—this is first-party intent data. It tells you who’s already on your site.
Intent data captures signals from across the web—like what topics companies are researching, what content they’re consuming, and which competitors they’re engaging with. This includes third-party and sometimes second-party sources, allowing you to identify in-market buyers even before they land on your website.
No. You can begin with a small-scale pilot focused on a handful of high-value accounts and key topics. This lets you test the impact and prove ROI before committing to a larger spend.
Involve sales from the start. Let them help choose intent topics and test the data with their top accounts. Also emphasize how intent provides warm talking points that make cold calls more relevant.
Behavioral targeting focuses on first-party data. Meanwhile, intent-based marketing adds third-party data to the mix, tracking what your target accounts are researching across the web.
Yes, your first-party data is a great place to start, especially signals like repeated visits to pricing pages.
But for broader visibility and earlier engagement, layering in third-party intent data gives you a full view of buying activity beyond your owned channels.
Build a shared intent playbook. Define what each signal means, set follow-up rules, and agree on KPIs. When both teams co-create the process, adoption is faster and smoother.
It tracks intent signals from different roles within the same company over time. This helps you identify the full buying committee, understand each person’s concerns, and tailor multi-threaded outreach with relevant messaging for each stakeholder.
We have updated our Privacy Notice. Please click here for details.